[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friacas
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Wed Nov 16 08:31:12 CET 2016
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Jim Reid wrote: >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 22:49, Carlos Friacas <cfriacas at fccn.pt> wrote: >> >> Either asking the WG Chair with more time on his/her record on that > role/group to step up as Vice-Chair, or run an election process if two > (or more) WG Chairs wish to become Vice-Chair on the same opportunity, > sounds acceptable to me. > > Please don't talk about "elections" in this specific context. We have > to decide on the *selection* process first. An election is just one of > many possibilities of selecting the candidate(s). Until we have > consensus that election is the way to proceed -- and I hope we never > converge on that option -- it is inappropriate to talk about electing > the RIPE (Vice) Chair. Hi Jim, All, What i stated previously is that running some sort of restricted (s)election would be something that wouldn't shock me. Regards, Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]