[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] NomCom constituency (was: RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friacas
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Fri Nov 18 10:35:53 CET 2016
Hi, (inline) On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Brian Nisbet wrote: > While I quite like the shape of Filiz's suggestions I would be very > careful of the level of input given to the NCC Management and/or Board. > While the RIPE Chair has to work very closely with the NCC, this is a > Community decision and must be clearly seen as same. +1 > If we do go for a NomCom I'd be inclined to suggest the WG Chairs, the > RIPE PC and possibly the community selected NRO members. +1 > I would very much agree with the conflict of interest provisions > extending to RIPE PC and WG Chairs. Albeit it is easier for them to step > down than for a permanent NCC staff member! Of course if a candidate > comes from one of the groups who are making up a NomCom, then they > should, at the very least, recluse themselves from that whole process. +1 > Thanks, > > Brian Just a few cents to add: When talking about the PC, probably involving the non-permanent/(s)elect*d PC members -- i.e. RIPE meeting hosts (from the last *N* meetings) -- could broaden up a bit the community support (and diversity?). Cheers, Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] NomCom constituency (was: RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]