[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Filiz Yilmaz
koalafil at gmail.com
Tue Oct 9 12:12:23 CEST 2018
No Jim, according to the process, WG Chairs Collective makes that decision and RIPE Community is left to endorse it, or not. The process reads: "The RIPE community will endorse the candidate put forward by the WG Chair collective." So practically RIPE Community will have the option of "objecting to a name" or "accepting the name". It is a very drastic measure to take compared to selecting names from a pool of candidates. Filiz On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:04 PM Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > > > On 9 Oct 2018, at 11:00, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have even more concerns that NOMCOM only hands-over a shortlist to the > WG Chairs Collective, who ultimately selects the Chair. > > Nope. The RIPE Community ultimately makes that decision. The WGCC should > select the best candidate from the shortlist. But the RIPE Community > decides if the WGCC made the right choice. > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-chair-discuss/attachments/20181009/5e245c5f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]