[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Oct 11 17:11:29 CEST 2018
>> it is somewhat odd that meeting attendance is the criterion in a >> community which claims that the mailing lists are the place where >> work is done. and, of course, this is re-discussed. > > Yes, there is a contradiction there. Sort of. However for RIPE, we're > appointing a Chair whose responsibilities largely focus around RIPE > meetings, not the work or policy-making that supposedly gets done on > RIPE's mailing lists. Drawing from the people who regularly > participate in RIPE meetings for both the Nomcom and Chair seems the > most sensible choice to me. i was merely pointing out yet another ietf procedural oddity. i am not against the ripe community using N out of M meetings as the principal qualifier for a nomcom pool. i suspect there might be some discussion of *which* meetings from folk distant from the amsterdam/rome/lisbon axis. i am in less of a position to take sides in that one than a scot is. :) randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]