[ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Mon Mar 25 13:03:59 CET 2019
On 23/03/2019 17:07, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 05:17:08PM +0100, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > Daniel, > >> Looking around for a credible confirming body within the RIPE >> 'ecosystem' the only one that comes to my mind is the RIPE NCC board. We > > [cut] > >> Of course this >> also assumes that the RIPE NCC board can be convinced to accept the task. > > [cut] > >> Can others please speak up so that this does not become a dialogue but a >> community discussion? And: text please! > > I'm speaking out ;-) But, I'm in doubt here. As EB member I would like > to refrain from discussing this particular idea, but would like to > encourage the others to comment on in. As an outgoing member of the EB that doesn't intend to restand I don't have any irons in the fire here. I think this is a totally inappropriate role for the EB. The EB is there to ensure that the financial affairs of the RIPE NCC are conducted in a sober and businesslike fashion. To be the confirming body is completely outside its remit. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]