[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurtis Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Thu May 14 16:43:53 CEST 2020
> On 14 May 2020, at 15:15, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > >> Given that circumstances have changed. There is a chance of this being >> funded by the NCC, it might be a full time role - would we perhaps >> have had a wider set of candidates if that was part of the call for >> nominations > > if the dog had not stopped to pee, he would have caught the rabbit. > > i think we all wish the circumstances are what they were when we last > met. unfortunately, no magic. > > so we are where we are. i suspect no one in the nomcom process of ill > intent or lack of integrity. i believe the candidates are genuine and > hope we'll do our best to support the ones chosen. I completely agree that the decision lies with the Nomcom and I have all respect for them. But they asked for feedback and then I would hope they would listen to it and make a decision based on the input. I am failing to understand what I sense is questioning of why we are providing input and even if we should provide input. - kurtis - -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-chair-discuss/attachments/20200514/ecfb394c/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]