[ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] [diversity] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] [diversity] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fearghas Mckay
fearghas at gmail.com
Mon Mar 29 21:54:04 CEST 2021
Leo et al > On 29 Mar 2021, at 04:30, Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org> wrote: > > Also, some people have commented but not stated if they support the daft as is, or would support the draft with a minor change. I've placed a question mark next to names where I'm not sure what a person's position is. It would be great if you could clarify your position. I support the CoC in principle with the clarification that the complainer has to control any moves to expand the process, either internally or externally. Moving it to a guide to what you can and should do from "what you must not do" is a positive move. Explain the benefits of being a good citizen of our community. f
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] [diversity] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] [diversity] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]