[ripe-list] Re-opened Last Call for Draft Document: RIPE NCC Staff Participation in the RIPE Community
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] Re-opened Last Call for Draft Document: RIPE NCC Staff Participation in the RIPE Community
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Re-opened Last Call for Draft Document: RIPE NCC Staff Participation in the RIPE Community
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sylvain Baya
abscoco at gmail.com
Wed Aug 2 22:30:26 CEST 2023
Dear RIPE List-ers, Hope this email finds you in good health! Please see my comments below, inline... Thanks. Le mer. 2 août 2023 à 19:06, Andy Davidson <andy at nosignal.org> a écrit : > Hi, > > > > Niall O’Reilly wrote: > > > /ripe-ncc-staff-participation-in-the-ripe-community-draft-v2 > <https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-documents/other-documents/ripe-ncc-staff-participation-in-the-ripe-community-draft-v2> > > I like that there is a document draft and I like that it is short, thank > you. :-) > > > > We need to make sure that it is not too short. > > > > The guiding principle that RIPE NCC team members are simultaneously valued > community members is correct and has my full support. > > > > It is appropriate too that NCC team members disclose their position to the > NCC when providing guidance in a RIPE community setting (p2). > > > > The document must emphasise the need for RIPE NCC staff to proactively > manage their conflict of interest risks when engaging with the community. > Particularly so in situations where a RIPE community working group, task > force, or committee undertakes projects with activity plan, budgets, or > headcount implications. It is evident that individuals involved in > authoring such activity plans or holding positions within the NCC > management cannot maintain the arm's length principle in various community > activities. This directly contradicts the wording outlined in principle 1 > (participate on same terms). > > > > As a responsible community, it is incumbent upon us to safeguard NCC staff > from potential conflicts of interest by defining clear protocols for how > such situations are considered and managed when NCC staff participate in > RIPE activities with activity plans, budgets, or hiring decisions. Can > this be captured in the lovely succinct way that you have approached the > first two drafts? > > > Hi Andy, Many thanks for stating it so softly, brother :-) ...i, too, would definitely like to see it captured. It seems, to me, that it would appropriately address the concerns, strongly, raised by Denis. ...*we* or ianal, though! Maybe we need a lawyer to join the conversation? ...btw, someone who can think in support for the community, as including the Staff, would be better :'-) imho! Shalom, --sb. > I recognise your effort in putting together this document, it is not a > simple undertaking to author governance material. > > > > Andy Davidson > -- > > [...] > -- Best Regards ! baya.sylvain [AT cmNOG DOT cm] |cmNOG's Structure <https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure>|cmNOG's Surveys <https://survey2.cmnog.cm/> Subscribe to the cmNOG's Mailing List <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/> __ *#LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«*Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous tous! #Amen!*»#MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement«*Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!*» (#Psaumes42:2)* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20230802/84c6e8b0/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] Re-opened Last Call for Draft Document: RIPE NCC Staff Participation in the RIPE Community
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Re-opened Last Call for Draft Document: RIPE NCC Staff Participation in the RIPE Community
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]