Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Previous message (by thread): NOTIFICATION: Emergency maintenance on www.ris.ripe.net
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrzej Adam Filip
anfi at poczta.onet.pl
Sun Aug 14 22:33:42 CEST 2005
IMHO ris databases (or at least riswhois server) should simply ignore default route (0.0.0.0/0). Are there any good reasons to keep riswhois reporting default routes? <quote> % This is RIPE NCC's Routing Information Service % whois gateway to collected BGP Routing Tables % IPv4 or IPv6 address to origin prefix match % % For more information visit http://www.ripe.net/ris/riswhois.html route: 0.0.0.0/0 origin: AS9009 descr: REALROUTE-AS RealROUTE International Network lastupd-frst: 2005-08-13 23:34Z 195.69.144.63 at rrc03 lastupd-last: 2005-08-13 23:34Z 195.69.144.63 at rrc03 seen-at: rrc03 num-rispeers: 1 source: RISWHOIS </quote> -- Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip anfi at priv.onet.pl anfi at xl.wp.pl All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing -- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
- Previous message (by thread): NOTIFICATION: Emergency maintenance on www.ris.ripe.net
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]