Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Previous message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrzej Adam Filip
anfi at poczta.onet.pl
Mon Aug 15 00:22:20 CEST 2005
Randy Bush wrote: >>Are there any good reasons to keep riswhois reporting default routes? > > so folk who generate and export such routes can debug. > > remember, one of the goals is operational, and debugging is > a part of that. OK. I would like to create "simple" tool for IP->AS mapping based on riswhois data. Would you suggest some "safe to ignore" margin for number of rispeers? -- Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip anfi at priv.onet.pl anfi at xl.wp.pl All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing -- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
- Previous message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]