Implicit Withdrawal - BGP Update Message
- Previous message (by thread): Implicit Withdrawal - BGP Update Message
- Next message (by thread): Implicit Withdrawal - BGP Update Message
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ado Maja
adomaja at yahoo.com
Sun Oct 11 18:21:17 CEST 2015
DearMaurizio and Colin, Thank youfor your responses. It was bymistake that I send an example where BGP messages are not coming from the samepeer. All four messages in the example were supposed to have same peer, andannounced IP address while different AS-PATH attribute. In thatcase I would have three implicit withdrawals, right? Colin, Are yousuggesting that if I look at five-days worth of BGP update messages and tryingto count how many implicit withdrawals during that time I have that I need to checkfirst appearance of every announced IP address and check if it is ‘truly’ newannouncement or possibly an implicit withdrawal that happened prior to the timeframe I am looking at? Also, Iwas completely ignoring the state change messages. Are you referring to the messagesbelow? I am not sure what to make out of those. Bestregards, Ado TIME:2001-9-16 00:00:09 TYPE:BGP4MP/BGP4MP_STATE_CHANGE AFI_IP FROM:192.65.185.151 OLD STATE:3 NEW STATE: 2 TIME:2001-9-16 00:00:09 TYPE:BGP4MP/BGP4MP_STATE_CHANGE AFI_IP FROM:192.65.185.151 OLD STATE:2 NEW STATE: 3 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ris-users/attachments/20151011/87d4aafa/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): Implicit Withdrawal - BGP Update Message
- Next message (by thread): Implicit Withdrawal - BGP Update Message
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]