[anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities]
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Recent Trends in List Discussion & RIPE Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Thu Mar 10 09:59:49 CET 2011
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > That is only useful if the organization doing so has some sort of > oversight or escalation power over what the receiver of those > complaints is supposed to do. > > It might actually make sense to involve the dutch CERT in this. Which one? I presume you are thinking about GOVCERT.nl ? If I am right, what would be that CERT's role with regard to this discussion? > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote: > >>Agreed, especially if the procedure provides for handing complaints to >>external abuse teams, e.g. according to IP allocations. Wilfried (wearing my ACOnet-CERT scarf for a moment :-) )
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Recent Trends in List Discussion & RIPE Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]