[anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities]
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities]
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Closure of LIR and Deregistration of Internet Number Resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 10 10:14:06 CET 2011
Purely a coordination role - where regulators and law enforcement may well have a role to play when there's malware involved. And yes, I do mean the people at govcert.nl thanks --srs On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet <Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at> wrote: > Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > >> That is only useful if the organization doing so has some sort of >> oversight or escalation power over what the receiver of those >> complaints is supposed to do. >> >> It might actually make sense to involve the dutch CERT in this. > > Which one? I presume you are thinking about GOVCERT.nl ? > > If I am right, what would be that CERT's role with regard to this > discussion? > >> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote: >> >>>Agreed, especially if the procedure provides for handing complaints to >>>external abuse teams, e.g. according to IP allocations. > > Wilfried > (wearing my ACOnet-CERT scarf for a moment :-) ) > > -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities]
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Closure of LIR and Deregistration of Internet Number Resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]