[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo at vegoda.org
Thu Nov 30 13:38:59 CET 2023
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 13:16, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote: > > On Thu 30/Nov/2023 12:40:46 +0100 Laura Atkins wrote: > > What happens if / when someone doesn’t? > > A minimal, yet useful reaction would be to remove their abuse PoC from RDAP > pages. If the convention is clear that network operators without abuse-c are > non-responders, it is easy for all the others to add the corresponding IPs to > their drop lists. Ripe NCC could even distribute non-responders lists. > > A motion to reclaim wasted resources can be set up at a later time. Publishing factual data that others can use to inform their own decision making processes seems quite different from reclaiming resources. A more productive path to evaluate. Thanks, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]