[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

As long as you publish it

--srs
________________________________
From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 6:08:59 PM
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it>
Cc: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 13:16, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote:
>
> On Thu 30/Nov/2023 12:40:46 +0100 Laura Atkins wrote:
> > What happens if / when someone doesn’t?
>
> A minimal, yet useful reaction would be to remove their abuse PoC from RDAP
> pages.  If the convention is clear that network operators without abuse-c are
> non-responders, it is easy for all the others to add the corresponding IPs to
> their drop lists.  Ripe NCC could even distribute non-responders lists.
>
> A motion to reclaim wasted resources can be set up at a later time.

Publishing factual data that others can use to inform their own
decision making processes seems quite different from reclaiming
resources. A more productive path to evaluate.

Thanks,

Leo

--

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231130/776fde90/attachment-0001.html>