[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Laura Atkins
laura at wordtothewise.com
Thu Nov 30 16:11:12 CET 2023
> On 30 Nov 2023, at 12:38, Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 13:16, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote: >> >> On Thu 30/Nov/2023 12:40:46 +0100 Laura Atkins wrote: >>> What happens if / when someone doesn’t? >> >> A minimal, yet useful reaction would be to remove their abuse PoC from RDAP >> pages. If the convention is clear that network operators without abuse-c are >> non-responders, it is easy for all the others to add the corresponding IPs to >> their drop lists. Ripe NCC could even distribute non-responders lists. >> >> A motion to reclaim wasted resources can be set up at a later time. > > Publishing factual data that others can use to inform their own > decision making processes seems quite different from reclaiming > resources. A more productive path to evaluate. The question is: how much will it cost to do this and how much will it actually improve anything? laura -- The Delivery Expert Laura Atkins Word to the Wise laura at wordtothewise.com Delivery hints and commentary: http://wordtothewise.com/blog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231130/c2128509/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]