[address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 06:52:05 CET 2021
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 7:41 PM Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > >>> C) IPv4 waiting list priority follows the size of existing > >>> allocations for the LIR. The lower amount of allocations, starting > >>> with zero, the higher the priority. > >> > >> if the purpose of new allocations is to allow entry, why would an LIR > >> with any existing allocation be given more? > > > > That would only happen if there are zero new entrants, as an LIR with any > > existing allocation would have a lower priority on the waiting list. > > i asked why, not how. imiho, the list should be for *new* entrants, > period. > If there are no new entrants, why should any available netblocks be kept unavailable for entrants who request additional netblocks? Not that I think it will ever happen ... -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20211210/cd537436/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]