[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrick Velder
lists at velder.li
Wed Apr 10 17:30:35 CEST 2024
+1 On 4/10/24 15:12, Matias Meier via members-discuss wrote: > > Hello together > > I agree on this, there has to be an option D “No change to rates, RIPE > reduces budget” in my opinion, otherwise the proposal should be rejected. > > Best regards > > Matias > > *Von:*members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> *Im Auftrag > von *Daniel Pearson > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 10. April 2024 14:58 > *An:* members-discuss at ripe.net > *Betreff:* Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] > [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals > > Hi Fergal, > > > Thank you for that clarification. > > > As-such I think this entire proposal needs to be rejected and sent > back to the board until a fourth option of no-change is added. > > Daniel~ > > On 4/10/24 7:54 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote: > > Dear Rob, > > The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be > rejected. It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in > the same way as the Executive Board election is run. So members > would be asked to vote for the three options in order of > preference and the scheme that achieves more than 50% of > preferences either on the first round or second round would be > deemed to have been chosen. > > Hope that helps. Fergal > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:46 PM Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Why do we not have an option that refuses any rate > increases, and forces RIPE to reduce it's budget? > > > > Option D - No change to rates, RIPE reduces budget according > to fewer number of LIR! > > I believe that is implicit if options A, B and C are all voted > down. > > Rob > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40ripe.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > > members-discuss mailing list > > members-discuss at ripe.net > > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > > Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesystems.net > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/lists%40velder.li -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240410/400286fe/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]