[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastien Brossier
sebastien at brossier.org
Thu Apr 11 10:51:45 CEST 2024
On 10/04/2024 14:54, Fergal Cunningham wrote: > The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be rejected. > It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in the same way as > the Executive Board election is run. So members would be asked to vote > for the three options in order of preference and the scheme that > achieves more than 50% of preferences either on the first round or > second round would be deemed to have been chosen. Hi, Is this even legal, wrt the articles of association ? Holding a vote to adopt an item, without a reject option. Best regards, Sebastien Brossier
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]