[db-wg] Puny code or UTF-8 (or both)?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Puny code or UTF-8 (or both)?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Puny code or UTF-8 (or both)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Mon Jul 13 14:18:38 CEST 2020
Hi Denis, > Do we therefore have support to introduce Puny code now and then consider how to move forward with UTF-8? I think this is probably the best solution. - Cynthia On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:13 PM ripedenis--- via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Colleagues > > After the recent discussion it seems their is support for the idea of > UTF-8, whilst there is also support for Puny code as an interim step. > > To implement UTF-8 in the RIPE Database requires much more detailed > discussions, including non technical aspects of the change. This is not > likely to happen quickly. > > There has been support shown to introduce Puny code as a first step > towards internationalisation of the data, which can be done quickly by the > RIPE NCC. > > Do we therefore have support to introduce Puny code now and then consider > how to move forward with UTF-8? > > cheers > denis > > co-chair DB-WG > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20200713/1c5ebd0a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Puny code or UTF-8 (or both)?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Puny code or UTF-8 (or both)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]